The
New York Times Book Review
editors asked Dean Koontz what book he thought was most "disappointing,
overrated, just not good." I didn't care that he listed Virginia
Woolf's To the Lighthouse because I
never liked it much either. But he also says he stops reading when he
realizes the author has embraced his character's nihilism. But why stop there?
I stop reading when the author embraces
his character's religious faith, Marxism, capitalism, feminism, politics,
sexual preferences, psychological school of thought--just about any
agenda. I don't go to fiction to be instructed in the author's way of
looking at the world. I go to fiction to hear a voice telling me about
people and places, moods and feelings, the sort of thing we used to call
"universal" in our stories and poems. And even then, if I don’t
like the voice, I’ll stop reading pretty quickly. There are simply too many books out there to
bother with the voices you don’t like listening to.
Monday, August 18, 2014
Saturday, July 26, 2014
The Redemption of an Over-aged Baseball Fan
I'm embarrassed to be a baseball fan.
It would be all right if I were just a casual fan who sees an occasional game, a guy who secretly finds the whole thing boring. It is. I realize that. For one thing, baseball games are way too long. Managers teach their hitters to go "deep in the count," which in baseball lingo means 3 and 2 counts and lots of foul balls. Make the pitcher work. Get his pitch count up and up until the opposing manager has to take him out, which is good because you want to get into the other team's bullpen. That's when our guys might be able to put a couple of runs on the board. Slow the game down. Get those pitchers tired.
Pitchers slow the game down too, especially when they have to work out of trouble. With runners on base, pitchers often go into slow-motion--rub the ball down, walk around the mound, reach for the rosin bag, shake off the catcher's signals, throw over to first to keep the runner close, call the third baseman over for a chat about who should cover a bunt. Lord, a half inning can run half an hour.
But I love every minute of it. It's high drama. And my emotional life hangs in the balance--absolute, pure elation on the one hand, total, heart-breaking depression on the other. And of course, that's why I'm embarrassed to be a baseball fan, especially now that I'm 72. Shouldn't such feelings have passed by now? Gone the way of all youthful passions? But there I am at the TV most nights with the sound turned off so I can read some book or do some lap work. I care. Damn it all to Hell. I care.
Today, however, I feel a little better about all this. My good friend Jim Kozelsky gave me his copy of Sports Illustrated, which has an article by Tom Verducci on "The Passion of Roger Angell," one of those magnificent New Yorker writers I've been reading for years. If you know baseball at all, you know Angell's essays on the national pastime. I won't heap superfluous praise on one of the great writers of our age, but note please that he is to be enshrined, at age 93, into baseball's Hall of Fame today, July 26, 2014. He'll be receiving the J.G. Taylor Spink Award, the "highest honor given by the Baseball Writers Association of America," according to Verducci. And it's worth saying that Roger Angell is not a member of BBWAA because he isn't a major league beat writer. He's way better than that.
And here's why I'm posting this entry: Roger Angell loves baseball the same way I do--and he too knows that it's embarrassing, but he also sees our redemption. Verducci quotes Angell: "It is foolish and childish, on the face of it, to affiliate ourselves with anything so insignificant and patently contrived and commercially exploitative as a professional sports team, and the amused superiority and icy scorn that the non-fan directs at the sports nut (I know this look--I know it by heart) is understandable and almost unanswerable. Almost. What is left out of this calculation, it seems to me, is the business of caring--caring deeply and passionately, really caring--which is a capacity or an emotion that has almost gone out of our lives. And so it seems possible that we have come to a time when it no longer matters so much what the caring is about, how frail or foolish is the object of that concern, as long as the feeling itself can be saved. Naivete--the infantile and ignoble joy that sends a grown man or woman to dancing and shouting with joy in the middle of the night over the haphazardous flight of a distant ball--seems a small price to pay for such a gift."
I couldn't have said it better myself--of course. Few could. I'm just happy, thrilled even, that this grand old man of baseball has said if for me. Bravo. And thank you.
It would be all right if I were just a casual fan who sees an occasional game, a guy who secretly finds the whole thing boring. It is. I realize that. For one thing, baseball games are way too long. Managers teach their hitters to go "deep in the count," which in baseball lingo means 3 and 2 counts and lots of foul balls. Make the pitcher work. Get his pitch count up and up until the opposing manager has to take him out, which is good because you want to get into the other team's bullpen. That's when our guys might be able to put a couple of runs on the board. Slow the game down. Get those pitchers tired.
Pitchers slow the game down too, especially when they have to work out of trouble. With runners on base, pitchers often go into slow-motion--rub the ball down, walk around the mound, reach for the rosin bag, shake off the catcher's signals, throw over to first to keep the runner close, call the third baseman over for a chat about who should cover a bunt. Lord, a half inning can run half an hour.
But I love every minute of it. It's high drama. And my emotional life hangs in the balance--absolute, pure elation on the one hand, total, heart-breaking depression on the other. And of course, that's why I'm embarrassed to be a baseball fan, especially now that I'm 72. Shouldn't such feelings have passed by now? Gone the way of all youthful passions? But there I am at the TV most nights with the sound turned off so I can read some book or do some lap work. I care. Damn it all to Hell. I care.
Today, however, I feel a little better about all this. My good friend Jim Kozelsky gave me his copy of Sports Illustrated, which has an article by Tom Verducci on "The Passion of Roger Angell," one of those magnificent New Yorker writers I've been reading for years. If you know baseball at all, you know Angell's essays on the national pastime. I won't heap superfluous praise on one of the great writers of our age, but note please that he is to be enshrined, at age 93, into baseball's Hall of Fame today, July 26, 2014. He'll be receiving the J.G. Taylor Spink Award, the "highest honor given by the Baseball Writers Association of America," according to Verducci. And it's worth saying that Roger Angell is not a member of BBWAA because he isn't a major league beat writer. He's way better than that.
And here's why I'm posting this entry: Roger Angell loves baseball the same way I do--and he too knows that it's embarrassing, but he also sees our redemption. Verducci quotes Angell: "It is foolish and childish, on the face of it, to affiliate ourselves with anything so insignificant and patently contrived and commercially exploitative as a professional sports team, and the amused superiority and icy scorn that the non-fan directs at the sports nut (I know this look--I know it by heart) is understandable and almost unanswerable. Almost. What is left out of this calculation, it seems to me, is the business of caring--caring deeply and passionately, really caring--which is a capacity or an emotion that has almost gone out of our lives. And so it seems possible that we have come to a time when it no longer matters so much what the caring is about, how frail or foolish is the object of that concern, as long as the feeling itself can be saved. Naivete--the infantile and ignoble joy that sends a grown man or woman to dancing and shouting with joy in the middle of the night over the haphazardous flight of a distant ball--seems a small price to pay for such a gift."
I couldn't have said it better myself--of course. Few could. I'm just happy, thrilled even, that this grand old man of baseball has said if for me. Bravo. And thank you.
Sunday, July 6, 2014
Thoughts on Joseph Smith's "American Crucifixion"
Today's
New York Times Book Review has a review by Benjamin Moser of Alex Beam's
book American Crucifixion: The Murder of Joseph Smith and the Fate of
the Mormon Church (published by something called PublicAffairs and selling
for $26.99).
I doubt I'll ever read the book, but I was taken with a few facts I hadn't known about crazy Joseph Smith and the spiritual phenomenon known as Mormonism, which he invented. First, Mormonism is a religion “whose followers believe that the Earth was created somewhere in the neighborhood of the planet Kolob, and that the Garden of Eden was created somewhere in the neighborhood of Kansas City." That sort of thing has made Mormonism such an inviting target for mockery that “there's no sport in scorning it," according to the review—and attacking Smith himself is so easy that it amounts to "a distasteful piling on."
But the reviewer piles on anyway: Smith in the 1820s "began to 'translate' from tablets he kept wrapped in a tablecloth, a series of visions that became the Book of Mormon, a turgid sci-fi novel that nonetheless managed to sway a nucleus of converts." But so many people hated Smith that he was murdered by a lynch mob when he was 38 in 1844.
I doubt I'll ever read the book, but I was taken with a few facts I hadn't known about crazy Joseph Smith and the spiritual phenomenon known as Mormonism, which he invented. First, Mormonism is a religion “whose followers believe that the Earth was created somewhere in the neighborhood of the planet Kolob, and that the Garden of Eden was created somewhere in the neighborhood of Kansas City." That sort of thing has made Mormonism such an inviting target for mockery that “there's no sport in scorning it," according to the review—and attacking Smith himself is so easy that it amounts to "a distasteful piling on."
But the reviewer piles on anyway: Smith in the 1820s "began to 'translate' from tablets he kept wrapped in a tablecloth, a series of visions that became the Book of Mormon, a turgid sci-fi novel that nonetheless managed to sway a nucleus of converts." But so many people hated Smith that he was murdered by a lynch mob when he was 38 in 1844.
His “crucifixion” changed everything. Silly and infuriating as Smith may have been in life, in death he was elevated beyond sainthood into godhood itself. He became "a flamboyant frontier L. Ron Hubbard." That is, for his followers Smith was much greater in death than he had ever been in life, for in death he joined all the other "miracle"-making saviors throughout history. And it’s also true that by any logical standard, it is no more difficult to believe in him and Mormonism than "than it is to believe that Moses parted the Red Sea, or that Muhammad ascended to heaven on a winged horse, or that Jesus was born of a virgin."
Take it all together, and you have a story worth
retelling, as Alex Beam has done
by taking familiar materials and refashioning them into an irreverent new book.
That sort of work gets my attention and
applause--which is as far as I'll go in the way of a secular genuflection—to Beam,
that is, not Smith. I might even read the damn book.
Addendum: According to a front-page story in the New
York Times on November 10, 2014, Smith had a “loyal partner” in his “loving
spouse Emma,” but nevertheless “took as many as 40 wives,” including one who
was only 14. He even married women
already married, sometimes to his friends and followers. Polygamy, in Smith's self-serving theology,
was the restoration of a practice "commanded by God" and followed by
Abraham and other Old Testament patriarchs—which thus enabled him to claim full
biblical immunity for a super-charged sex life. American
Crucifixion is now officially elevated to “on my nightstand” status. I’ve got to know more about this guy.
Thursday, June 26, 2014
Whining Poets
I'm tired of poets whining about the public not appreciating them. I know more poets than most people do because I've spent my life in colleges and universities which have taken them in as Writers in Residence (comfy positions for poets whose names are sometimes recognized) and as faculty members in creative writing departments around the country. One blogger claimed in 2012 there were 71 MFA programs (Masters in Fine Arts) and another 112 programs where poets can teach Creative Writing majors; the blogger estimated there are at least 800 new MFA's given out every year. I doubt if anyone knows how many are poets. But my guess is too many.
I like poetry and have written about it, and about poets, most of my professional career. But there is no way anyone can keep up with the the annual tidal wave of new poets, new books of poetry, and new schools training them. And it should be made clear from the outset that there are many more good poets now than there ever have been before. But because of their sheer numbers, they go unread.
The poets themselves and the Creative Writing programs they come from are their own audiences. They attend each other's readings and pretend there is a place for them someplace else in the literate universe. That is delusional, but it's a fiction they all hold on to--just as they hold on to the idea that they are under-read and under-appreciated. Their usual posture is a sort of hang-dog look of disappointment and lofty superiority, a difficult combination that they manage with the same irritating panache observed in perpetually misunderstood teenagers.
I think maybe they should take a close look at T. S. Eliot and Wallace Stevens, both of whom worked for a living, Eliot as a banker at first, then in the publishing business, and Stevens in the insurance world. They didn't whine about audiences. They wrote when they could, squeezed it in between other obligations. Nothing hang-dog about them.
I like poetry and have written about it, and about poets, most of my professional career. But there is no way anyone can keep up with the the annual tidal wave of new poets, new books of poetry, and new schools training them. And it should be made clear from the outset that there are many more good poets now than there ever have been before. But because of their sheer numbers, they go unread.
The poets themselves and the Creative Writing programs they come from are their own audiences. They attend each other's readings and pretend there is a place for them someplace else in the literate universe. That is delusional, but it's a fiction they all hold on to--just as they hold on to the idea that they are under-read and under-appreciated. Their usual posture is a sort of hang-dog look of disappointment and lofty superiority, a difficult combination that they manage with the same irritating panache observed in perpetually misunderstood teenagers.
I think maybe they should take a close look at T. S. Eliot and Wallace Stevens, both of whom worked for a living, Eliot as a banker at first, then in the publishing business, and Stevens in the insurance world. They didn't whine about audiences. They wrote when they could, squeezed it in between other obligations. Nothing hang-dog about them.
Saturday, June 21, 2014
God and Superstition
Superstition. noun
su·per·sti·tion
1. Excessively credulous belief in and reverence for supernatural beings: "He dismissed the ghost stories as mere superstition."
2. Unfounded belief, credulity, fallacy, delusion.
3. A widely held but unjustified belief in supernatural causation.
Synonyms: myth, belief, old wive's tale.
No one wants to be known as superstitious, so gullible as to believe things that are clearly untrue. We smile with superiority at the person who believes good luck comes from a rabbit's foot, bad luck from a black cat; that toads cause warts and eating fish will make you smart. We're way too smart to believe in things like that.
And yet no one who believes in God thinks he's being superstitious.
1. Excessively credulous belief in and reverence for supernatural beings: "He dismissed the ghost stories as mere superstition."
2. Unfounded belief, credulity, fallacy, delusion.
3. A widely held but unjustified belief in supernatural causation.
Synonyms: myth, belief, old wive's tale.
No one wants to be known as superstitious, so gullible as to believe things that are clearly untrue. We smile with superiority at the person who believes good luck comes from a rabbit's foot, bad luck from a black cat; that toads cause warts and eating fish will make you smart. We're way too smart to believe in things like that.
And yet no one who believes in God thinks he's being superstitious.
Friday, June 20, 2014
Speaking of Crosswords. . .
I bow in admiration to the men and women who construct crossword puzzles, "cruciverbalists." I tried for a while to construct my own, and did manage to put two or three together, with great pride, I might add, but all I could manage was the bare-bones success of a school boy. And I knew by constant exposure to the great constructors that I would never be able to match their wittiness and intricate patterning--their genius.
So I gave it up and now sit back and enjoy the brilliant puzzles they have put together. For me. And you too. I know most of them don't do it for the money because unless they grind out a great many of them, it isn't likely they can make much of a living with this talent.. They earn part-time money by being fiendishly creative, while I spend a few late night hours, when I am unfit for proper work, by trying to match wits with them. They're my heroes--and I thank them all.
What follows is a sampling of great minds having fun in a 15 x 15 grid.
What follows is a sampling of great minds having fun in a 15 x 15 grid.
From The New York Times Ultimate Crossword
Omnibus: 1001 Puzzles from the Pages of
The New York Times (2003), edited by Will Shortz.
Constructor
Puzzle No. Clue / Answer
Ernie Furtado
19 Eschew food
/ fast
Norma Steinberg
21 Worthless
agreements? / mtpromises
Nonchalant
view of fortune / ezcomeezgo
Trip Payne
27 Battle
types /
Sopranos
Express
wonderment / oohandahh
Chuck Deodene 34 Cleaned
a windshield / squeegeed
Wayne Robert Williams
39 Coming out on
top? /
bald
Jim Page 44 Turning /
aswirl
Trip Payne 45 What you used to be / thou
Great
shakes? / hulas
Camels’
destinations? / ashtrays
Bob Sefick 73 Clicker that might be used
on a trawler? / castanet
Harvey Estes 94 Square meal? /
ravioli
Harvey Estes 152 Perform perfectly /
dotoat
A.J. Santora 155 Stone-broke /
assetless
Nancy Joline 161 Easter preceder / nor
Nancy S. Ross 170 A.M. or P.M., e.g. / abbr
Jim Page 177 Classics trio /
esses
Rich Norris 183 One whose work is
decreasing? / ironer
Brendan Emmett Quigley
224 Steve Forbes is
surrounded by them / esses
Bryant White 225 St.
Lawrence sight / 1001islands
extremely
rare /
1ina1000000
Chuck Deodene 239 Outdoor air / serenade
Charles Gersch 269 Concert finale / ina
Gregory E. Paul 271 It may be rounded on a diamond
/ third [base]
Jim Page 274 Contents of some sleeves / lps
Elizabeth Gorski 275 Life in the early days /
embryo
Lois Sidway 278 Make or break, e.g. / verb
Sidney Robbins 293 Bosom companions / bras
Jonathan Schmalzbach
359 Nom de
crook /
alias
Chuck Deodene 363 Eyesores or eye sores /
sties
Richard Hughes 379 Y’s half brothers /
aeiou
Jonathan Schmalzbach
380 Seagoing
departure from a Scandinavian capital? /
osloboattochina
Aggressive
personality in the Far East? /
taipeibehavior
South
American football player? / sandiegocharger
Cathy Millhauser 381 Like mosquitoes at a
camp? /
maliciousintent
Stephanie Spadaccini 384 Item filed by a
secretary? / nail
Alfo Micci 393 M /
firstofthemonth
O / secondincommand
Y / thefourthofjuly
E / beethovensthird
O / secondincommand
Y / thefourthofjuly
E / beethovensthird
Richard Thomas 428 Food bar / oleo
Harvey Estes 446 Scoundrel, to Betsy Ross? sewandsew
Completely,
to a pitcher? threwandthrew
Presently,
to a shopaholic? buyandbuy
David J. Kahn 447 Pavarotti, to fans /
kingofthehighcs
Martin Ashwood-Smith
460 It turns into a
different story / spiralstaircase
Randolph Ross 464 Dressing place /
cruet
[clue
54A] =
/ twoxtwentyseven]
Harvey Estes 470 Final copy: Abbr.
/ obit
Randolph Ross 555 Minnesota twins / ens
[the letter “n”]
David J. Kahn 584 “Where’s my watch?” asked
Captain Hook____ /
offhandedly
“Get
lost, Toto!” shouted the Tin
Man____ /
heartlessly
“I’m
a beauty,” said Venus de Milo____ /
disarmingly
Lois Sidway 599 Not dose / dese
Bryant White 602 Coasters for Socrates,
e.g. /
anagram
Kiran S. Kedlaya 627 Betraying, briefly /
doublexing
Sidney L. Robbins 646 Saying / saw
Manny Nosowsky 654 Where exes are made / reno
Lois Sidway 668 Overhead lighting? / halo
Norma Steinberg 669 Marriage? /
altaredstate
Chuck Deodene 749 Acupuncturist’s fee? stickerprice
Dermatologist’s
pronouncement? rashdecision
Arthroscopic
surgeries? / jointventures
Martin Schneider 852 B /
cflat
Hugh Davis 857 Like some kisses and
bases /
stolen
Bob Klahn 885 Fall setting / eden
Martin Ashwood-Smith
890 Appropriate cry
for Crusoe? / tgif
Patrick Jordan 896 Isn’t on the street? / aint
Martin Ashwood-Smith
and Bob Klahn 904 Hamlet’s relatives /
towns
William Bernhardt 914 Peter or the Wolfe? / nero
Richard Silvestri 924 Works on pumps, maybe /
resoles
Jim Page 944 At first /
onbase
Elizabeth Gorski 955 Child, for one /
chef
Frances Hansen 974 Result of a burning
desire / arson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Visions and Revisions at 81
I miss toiling away contentedly at my quiet, and lonely writing desk pursuing topics in American literature. I would be hard at...
-
Finding Campobasso May 2011 Bobbi and I in Cifelli, Italy Campobasso is tucked quietly into the Apennine mountains...
-
That's the self-help mantra coined by the French psychologist Emile Coue (1857-1926), the one that caught on in the 1920s, the era ...